民国时期川边土司与藏传佛教寺院矛盾调处机制研究  

On Contradiction Mediating System between Chieftains in Chuangbian Area and Tibetan Buddhism Temples in the Republican Period

作　　者：贾霄锋[1] 马千惠[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆理工大学,重庆400054

出　　处：《青海民族研究》2016年第4期13-18,共6页Qinghai Journal of Ethnology

基　　金：作者主持的中国博士后科学基金第项目56批面上项目(一等资助)<民国时期藏传佛教与西康地区社会管理研究>(资助号:2014M560713);四川大学2014年博士后专项基金特别资助<民国时期藏传佛教与西康地区社会管理研究>;主研国家社科基金项目<明清民国时期甘青川边藏区社会控制研究>(批准号:11XZS013)阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：经过清末赵尔丰改土归流,川边土司政治影响力逐渐式微,在民国时期逐渐向地方乡绅转变。此间,川边土司一方面依然依靠传统的藏传佛教力量维护其在地方的控制力和影响力;另一方面则与藏传佛教寺院因各种利益关系产生矛盾。民国时期川边土司与藏传佛教寺院之间冲突体现在"大白事件"和"朱倭土司与灵寿寺械斗"事件,调节这一时期川边土司和辖区外相互没有政教隶属关系的藏传佛教寺院的矛盾,倚重于国民政府以政治调处结合军事威慑的调处机制化解双方矛盾。国民政府对双方矛盾调处的掌控力不断加强,成为民国时期土司与藏传佛教寺院矛盾调处的主导力量。After the bureaucratization of native officers of Zhaoerfeng at the late of Qing Dynsaty,the political influence of chieftains in Chuanbian area was declining,and gradually transformed as local squires in the Republican period.During that time,the chieftains still depended on local Tibetan Buddhism temples to maintain its control on the local society,but contradictions were produced between them at the same time. ＂ Dabai Event＂ and ＂the fighting between Zhuwo Chieftain and Lingshou Temple＂ was the typical contradictions.To mediate the contradictions between the chieftains and Tibetan Buddhism temples which had no affiliations with the former mainly relied on the national government via the mediating system which combined political method and military force.The increase of control power of the national government enabled it to be the main force for solving the contradictions.

关 键 词：民国时期 川边土司 藏传佛教寺院 矛盾调处机制 

分 类 号：K28[历史地理—历史学]