检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡腊梅 曾晓花[1] Cai La-Mei Zeng Xiao-hua(Department of Emergency, Xiaolan Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Zhongshan 528415, China)
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学附属小榄医院急诊科,中山528415
出 处:《中国医药导刊》2016年第11期1165-1166,共2页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
摘 要:目的:探讨优化急诊护理路径对脑卒中患者临床结局及舒适度的影响。方法:96例脑卒中患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各48例,对照组采取常规急诊护理模式,观察组采取急诊护理路径优化,比较两组干预2、3个月后的临床指标和1年内生存率及再入院率。结果:观察组第一救治时间、待手术时间、48h病死率、复发率、3个月并发症发生率及UEX率显著短于对照组(P<0.05),观察组舒适度、1年内生存率明显高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组再入院率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:优化急性脑卒中患者急诊护理流程可取得较好护理效果,提高预后水平。Objective: To explore the effect of optimizing emergency nursing path on the clinical outcome and comfort degree of patients with stroke. Methods: 96 cases of stroke patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, each of 48 cases, the control group took routine emergency nursing mode, the observation group adopted emergency nursing path optimization, compared two groups of clinical intervention index 2, after 3 months and 1 years survival rate and readmission rate. Results:The observation group in the first treatment time, pre operation time, 48 h mortality, recurrence rate and complication rate of 3 months and UEX was significantly shorter than the control group(P〈0.05), the observation group comfort, 1 years survival rate was significantly higher than the control group(P〈0.05); the observation group readmission rate significantly lower than the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion: Optimizing the emergency nursing process of patients with acute cerebral apoplexy can get better nursing effect and improve the prognosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40