目的关系的表征:庭审会话选择问句(不)提醒功能探析  

Manifestation of Goal Relations: An Investigation into the( Non-) Reminding Function of Alternative Questions in Courtroom Conversation

作　　者：李雅楠[1] 陈海庆[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学外国语学院,辽宁大连116024

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第11期14-17,共4页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目:中国当代庭审话语语调表征及其信息效果研究(15BFX066)

摘　　要：庭审会话中的选择问句在司法实践中起到提醒功能,它揭示了庭审参与者目的关系不一致现象。采用目的原则为理论框架,汉语语调为研究方法,转写CCTV12《庭审现场》栏目庭审案件作为语料,对法庭审判中的选择问句功能进行了一项实证研究。研究结果表明,庭审话语中选择问句的焦点位置有助于实现其提醒功能,但提醒与否、何时提醒则由说话人的身份决定。Alternative questions in courtroom conversation can play the reminding function in judicial practice, which manifests the goal relations among courtroom participants. Applying the principle of goal direction and the intonation approach, this paper conducts an empirical study of alternative questions＇ function in Chinese courtroom conversation by analyzing cases chosen from CCTV12 Ting Shen Xian Chang program. It found that the location of focus in alternative question helps to achieve speakers＇ reminding function. But whether to remind or not and under what circumstances to remind are determined by speakers＇ identity.

关 键 词：目的关系 (不)提醒功能 选择问句 语调 

分 类 号：H315[语言文字—英语] D90-055[政治法律—法学理论]