我国政府绩效中的潜绩:生成、类型与主要评估维度  

The Latent Performance in Government Performance:Generation,Classification and Evaluation

作　　者：尚虎平[1,2] 杨娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学政治与公共管理学院 [2]江苏省新型城镇化与社会治理协同创新中心

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2016年第11期69-74,81,共7页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金"我国县级政府潜绩评估研究"(14BGL115);教育部人文社科基金"我国西部生态脆弱性评估与政府应对研究"(13YJAZH076);国家自然科学基金重点项目"政府职能转变背景下绩效管理研究"(71433005)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：我国以GDP为导向的政府显绩评价使得各地走上了粗放发展的模式。针对这种只强调显绩而忽视潜绩的问题,习近平同志特别强调,"‘潜’是‘显’的基础,‘显’是‘潜’的结果"。当前我国各地对评估显绩有着较好的经验积累,但对潜绩却缺乏深刻的洞察。我们发现,在政府绩效的完整生成过程中,存在着预潜绩、配置效率型潜绩、X-效率型潜绩、可持续性潜绩、情境性潜绩等几种政府潜绩。要有效评估它们,就需要从"使命评估""战略评估""逆评估"、职能优化评估、社会诚信度评估等内容入手。In China, GDP-oriented government performance evaluation focuses on surface, short-term achievements, making performance evaluation a one-sided model. In view of the status quo of emphasizing on visible performance and ignoring latent performance, President Xi Jinping especially emphasized that ＂The latent performance is the basis of transparent performance, and visible performance is the result of latent performance＂. We found that there are several types of latent performance among the full generation of government performance, such as, expected performance, allocative efficiency, X-efficiency, sustainable performance and situational performance. In order to evaluate them effectively, it is necessary to evaluate ＂mission＂, ＂strategy＂, function optimization, and social credibility＂.

关 键 词：政府绩效 生成 显绩 潜绩 评估 

分 类 号：D63[政治法律—政治学]