人民陪审实践:法治中国语境下的考量与反思——基于上海三区法院陪审运行之研究  

People Jury Practice: Considerations and Reflections on Chinese Legal——Based on the Run of Jury in Three Court Shanghai

作　　者：郑成良[1] 李文杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200030

出　　处：《法学杂志》2016年第11期77-88,共12页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：调查发现,人民陪审实践中"陪审虚化"依然严重,制度认同效果低下,基本理念错位,陪审员阅卷、意见表达难的问题未实质改观。造成这一困境的原因具多面性,包括规范设置、司法目的、司法任务、陪审文化和合议结构等因素:单一的制度完善或改革难以突破既有问题。因此,应在司法改革总体目标映射下应重新审视制度目的,强化陪审和诉讼的衔接,推动诉讼制度、陪审制度和社会互动三大主题的一体性、本真性改革。The survey found that ＂Jury blur＂ is still serious in the practice of People Jury System, Identification of System is low, the basic concept of dislocation, Difficult problem of Marking and Express their views are not substantive change The reason for this dilemma is a multi -faceted, including setting norms, judicial purposes, judicial task, the jury cultural and collegial structure and other factors, Therefore, a single system to improve or reform is difficult to break the existing issues, judicial reform should re - examine the overall objective of the mapping system is designed to strengthen cohesion and jury proceedings, promote litigation, the jury system and the social interaction of the three themes of unity, this true reform.

关 键 词：人民陪审员制度 陪审员 陪审虚化 法治中国 

分 类 号：D926.22[政治法律—法学]