机构地区:[1]邯郸市中心医院肾内一科,邯郸056001 [2]北京大学第一医院肾内科,北京大学肾脏病研究所,卫生部重点实验室,教育部慢性肾脏病防治重点实验室(北京大学),北京100034
出 处:《中国血液净化》2016年第11期600-604,共5页Chinese Journal of Blood Purification
摘 要:目的探讨腹膜透析患者存在的营养不良、炎症状态、心血管疾病(动脉硬化)综合征(malnutrition-inflammation-atherosclerosis,MIA综合征),与认知功能的关系。方法临床稳定的透析龄大于3月的腹膜透析患者240例,调查其总认知功能和特异认知功能。记录患者一般情况及生化指标,根据是否白蛋白≤35g/L、超敏-C反应蛋≥3mg/L,判断是否存在营养不良、炎症状态,结合有无心血管病,将患者分为3组,即3个因素均无者,为MIA0组;3个因素中具备任何1种者,为MIA1组;3个因素中具备任意2种或2种以上者,为MIA2组。结果①本组患者中营养不良者36例(15.0%),慢性炎症者114例(47.5%),心血管疾病者86例(35.8%)。MIA0,MIA1和MIA2组分别为79例(32.9%)、87例(36.3%)、74例(30.8%)。总认知障碍发生率在3组分别为6例(7.6%)、16例(18.4%)、15例(20.3%)。在修正的简易智力状态检查量表得分(t=3.629,P〈0.001;t=-2.518,P=0.013)、认知障碍(χ2=5.184,P=0.023;χ2=4.197,P=0.040)、执行能力障碍(χ2=14.574,P〈0.001;χ2=6.817,P=0.009)、连线试验B(χ2=9.317,P=0.002;χ2=4.236,P=0.040)方面,MIA2及MIA1组均较MIA0组差;在连线试验A(χ2=7.281,P=0.007;χ2=15.028,P〈0.001)及视觉空间能力得分(t=2.122,P=0.035;t=2.893,P=0.004)方面,MIA2组较MIA1及MIA0组均差;在即刻记忆得分方面,MIA2组较MIA0组差(t=2.071,P=0.040)。结论腹膜透析患者中MIA综合征和认知障碍密切相关,而罹患MIA综合征2种以上危险因素者较合并0~1个危险因素患者认知障碍的发生率更高、程度更重。Objective This study was to explore the association of malnutrition-inflammation- athero- sclerosis syndrome (MIA) with cognitive function in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Methods A total of 240 clinically stable patients who performed PD for at least 3 months were enrolled. The global cognitive function and specific cognitive functions were investigated. Demographic and biochemical data were record- ed. Serum albumin ≤35g/L and high sensitive C-reactive protein ≥3mg/L were used to diagnose malnutrition and inflammation respectively in these patients. MIA0 referred to those without any of the 3 abnormalities, and MIA1 and MIA2 referred to those with one and 2-3 abnormalities respectively. Results The prevalence of malnutrition, inflammation and cardiovascular disease was 15.0% (n=36), 47.5% (n=114), and 35.8% (n=86) respectively. The numbers of patients in MIA0, MIA1, and MIA2 group were 79 (32.9%), 87 (36.3%), and 74 (30.8%) respectively. The prevalence of global cognitive impairment was 6 (7.6%), 16 (18.4%), and 15 (20.3%) in MIA0, MIA1, and MIA2 groups respectively. As compared to MIA0 group, patients in MIA2 and MIA1 groups had significantly lower 3MS scores (t=3.629, P〈0.001; t=-2.518, P=-0.013), higher prevalence of cognitive impairment (χ2=5.184, P=0.023; χ2=4.197, P=0.040) and executive dysfunction (χ2=14.574, P〈0.001; χ2=6.817, P=0.009), and longer time on completing trails B (χ2=9.317, P=0.002; χ2=4.236, P=0.040). The time on completing trails A (χ2=7.281, P=0.007; χ2=15.028, P〈0.001) was longer and the scores of visuospatial skills (t=-2.122, P=-0.035; t=2.893, P=0.004) were lower in MIA2 group than in MIA1 and MIA0 groups. The scores of immediate memory were lower in MIA2 group than in MIA0 group (t=2.071, P=0.040). Conclusion The MIA syndrome was closely associated with cognitive impairment in PD patients. Patients with two factors of MIA were prone to have severer cognitive impairment than those without M
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...