检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王修华[1] 谷溪[1] 王海成[2] WANG Xiu-hua GU Xi WANG Hai-cheng
机构地区:[1]湖南大学金融与统计学院 [2]湖南大学经济与贸易学院
出 处:《国际贸易问题》2016年第11期143-153,共11页Journal of International Trade
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目(71303077);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71271047);湖南省研究生创新项目(CX2016B139);湖南省研究生创新项目(CX2016B143)的资助
摘 要:本文基于2008年和2010年中国综合社会调查(CGSS)数据,从主观幸福感角度分析了外商直接投资对中国居民的福利影响。实证结果表明:从整体来看,外商直接投资显著提高了中国居民的福利,并通过影响收入、收入差距和环境污染三条机制影响我国居民主观幸福感;在政府质量较高和政府质量较低的地区,外商直接投资通过加强正向渗透作用和替代效应促进居民主观幸福感的提升;而在政府质量中等的地区,外商直接投资对居民福利的影响不显著;此外,不同来源地的外商直接投资对居民主观幸福感的影响存在差异。From the micro perspective, this paper analyzes the welfare effects of foreign direct investment from the perspective of subjective well-being and its mechanism of action. Based on the data from CGSS(2008) and CGSS(2010),the empirical analysis shows that foreign direct investment has a positive impact on the subjective well being in China, and mainly through the income, income gap and environmental pollution three channels to affect residents' subjective well being. Further research shows that this impact is also influenced by the local government's quality. In areas with relatively high and low government quality, the positive effect of foreign direct investment is more significant by substitution effect and penetration effect enhancement. However, the positive effect is not significant when it comes to the middle level government quality areas. Moreover, the FDI from different district exerts different effect on residents' subjective well being.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222