追续权入法的三个假说及其检验  

Three Hypotheses and its Examination of the Right of Pursuit

作　　者：孙山[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学经济法学院,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2016年第6期107-118,共12页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目(13CFX089);西北政法大学青年学术创新团队项目

摘　　要：追续权入法是《著作权法》第三次修改中的重要议题之一。在支持者看来,追续权入法可以在天价作品与贫困书画家之间实现利益衡平,激发书画家的创作热情,实现实质正义。但是,追续权入法所赖以成立的三个假说却无一能被确证,其入法的必要性、可能性、理论体系的合逻辑性和实践展开的可操作性均存疑问,看似微不足道的利益重新分配有可能破坏美术作品市场运作所需的完整产业链。因此,应当谨慎对待追续权的入法问题,在未获充分论证的情况下宜暂缓入法以节约有限的立法资源,有效推进《著作权法》的第三次修改。The artists＇resale royalty right is one of the most important topics for discussion during the third revision of Copyright Law. Supporters considered that the artists＇resale royalty right could possibly balance sky -high price works and impoverished artists, stimulate artists＇ reation enthusiasm, and also realize substantial justice. However those three hypotheses which the artists＇resale royalty right founded on were not irrevocably proved, we have too much questions about its necessity, possibility, logic of theoretical system and feasibility of practice, it may destroy the whole industrial chain which the mature fine arts market needed. Therefore we must take into account the right of pursuit discreetly, and should postpone its amendment until abundant proofs found.

关 键 词：追续权 美术作品 假说 实质正义 产业链 

分 类 号：DF523.1[政治法律—民商法学]