鉴定人出庭作证制度实证研究  

Empirical study on the system of expert's attending in court

作　　者：陈邦达[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学科学研究院,上海松江201620

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2016年第6期171-181,共11页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(14SFB30019)"医疗损害鉴定不信任问题实证研究";中国博士后科学基金第8批特别资助项目(2005T80420)"鉴定人出庭作证制度研究"

摘　　要：为强化鉴定意见质证,刑诉法规定了鉴定人出庭的情形,加大鉴定人人身安全保护,明确拒不出庭的后果,并通过专家辅助人出庭以加强鉴定意见质证。2012年《刑事诉讼法》新规定实施的效果值得研究。鉴定人出庭案例的实证分析表明,"有必要出庭"情形的模糊表述造成实践做法不一。鉴定人出庭时控辩质证水平有所提高,但鉴定人与专家辅助人无法对话影响质证效果。鉴定人出庭的成本较大,出庭费用无保障,影响其积极性。应克服专家证人制度移植的张力,重视鉴定人出庭的实质效果,完善鉴定人出庭保障机制以保护当事人的对质权,以庭审中心变革为契机推动鉴定制度完善,降低鉴定人出庭负担,提高其出庭积极性。Criminal Procedure Law adopted in 2012 has made some amendments to the mechanism of expert witneses＇ testifying in court, with the purpose of improving the effect of evaluation of scientific evidence. It defined the situations where experts should testify in court, strengthened the protection of expert witnesses, and stipulated the results if experts do not testify in court. Empirical study shows that the situations where experts must testify in court are not clear. In spite of Examining of scientific evidence has been promoted, expert witnesses and expert assistants do not testify in court at the same time becomes the barrier for examining. Cost of etoperts＂ testit^ing in court is high, but there is no guarantee for the payment of etoperts＇extra work. To solve these problems, we should emphasize the effect of etoperts＇testifying in court, protect litigants＇rights, and promote the reform of etoperts＇attending in court under the current reform of placing the trial as the center of the criminal proceedings. Experts attending in court should obey the principal of efficiency and trial.

关 键 词：鉴定人出庭 鉴定意见质证 专家辅助人 

分 类 号：D918.9[政治法律—法学]