湿地水鸟栖息水位测量方法探析--以涉禽为例  

The Effect of Measurement Method on Recorded Water Depths Used by Wetland Grallatores

作　　者：吴庆明[1] 何富英[1] 苏立英 朱井丽[1] 邹红菲[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北林业大学野生动物资源学院,哈尔滨150040 [2]International Crane Foundation, Baraboo, WI5391, USA

出　　处：《野生动物学报》2016年第4期346-350,共5页CHINESE JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费(2572014CA05);江西省主要学科学术和技术带头人培养计划项目(20153BCB22007);国家林业局野生动物保护管理项目;黑龙江省博士后科研启动金(LBH-Q14009);国家自然科学基金(31470016,31401978)

摘　　要：水位不仅直接关系着湿地的存在,更关系着湿地水鸟的栖息利用。关于湿地水鸟栖息水位的测量,一直是难以解决的关键问题。目前在科研中普遍采用相对水位测量,但多难以反映水鸟所在位置的真实水位和真实的科研成果。为了更为深入地掌握湿地水鸟栖息水位的真实数据,对鸟体形态指标法和水文水位法进行了方法步骤、优缺点等方面的详细介绍,并初步认为:鸟体形态指标法理论上更适合湿地水鸟栖息水位的测量,且是可行的,建议尝试使用鸟体形态指标法进行实践验证和推广。Water level is not only the key factor for wetland existence,but also directly influences habitat utilization of wetland waterfowl.The water depths used by wetland waterfowl are typically difficult to accurately and precisely measure.Contemporary researchers have recorded relative water level measurements.These results often fail to convey real information on wetland waterfowl habitat and have only indirect bearing on resource management and policy- making.In an effort to record more applicable information on wetland waterfowl and water levels in their habitats,we applied the bird body morphological index method and hydrology water level method.We quantitatively compared the advantages and disadvantages of these methods.Our results showed that bird body morphological index method proved suitable for monitoring habitat water levels of wetland waterfowl based on current scientific technology.We recommend that bird body morphological index method should be applied in field research.

关 键 词：湿地水鸟 栖息水位 鸟体形态指标法 水文水位法 涉禽 

分 类 号：Q31[生物学—遗传学]