检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王建武[1]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省社会科学院社会学研究所
出 处:《青年研究》2016年第6期32-40,92,共9页Youth Studies
摘 要:通过全国性的调查数据,本文探讨了互联网不同使用类型、参与在线政治讨论对基于个体利益诉求表达的政治参与的影响。研究发现:互联网信息获取型使用和沟通互动型使用对维权抗争参与有显著影响,但对意见表达参与没有显著影响;从群体角度看,两种互联网使用类型均对不同收入者的维权抗争参与有显著影响,沟通互动型使用会显著提高低教育程度者的维权抗争参与可能性;参与在线政治讨论对意见表达和维权抗争参与均有促进作用。总之,互联网拓展了政治参与渠道,能够缓解社会对立性情绪和矛盾,但互联网空间非理性因素也可能给低教育程度者带来消极的影响。Through the national survey data,this paper explores the influences of different types in internet use and participation in online political discussion on political participation,which is based on the expression of individual 's interest appeal. According to the findings, using the type of internet information access and using the type of communication interaction have significant influences on participation in rightful resistance, but have no significant influence on participation in opinion expression. For people with different income level,the two types of internet use have positive influencing effects on their participation in rightful resistance; while using the type of communication interaction would significantly improve the rate of participation in rightful resistance. Participation in online political discussion has positive influences on improving opinion expression and participation in rightful resistance.Considering positively,the internet platform has expanded the channel of political participation,it could alleviate social contradictory emotion and conflict,but the non-rational factors on the internet space could bring greater negative influences to the low educated people.
关 键 词:互联网使用 在线政治讨论 意见表达参与 维权抗争参与
分 类 号:D621.5[政治法律—政治学] G206[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.102