说话者意图与会话蕴含——对语义—语用论者的反驳  

Speaker's Intention and Conversational Implicature:A Response to Semantic-Pragmatic Approach

作　　者：荣立武[1] 潘诠[2] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学哲学与社会发展学院 [2]滨州职业学院会计学院

出　　处：《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第6期146-152,共7页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：山东大学自主创新基金人文社科团队项目"意图与行动的哲学研究"(IFYT12049);山东省社科规划青年项目"内涵语义的辩护途径"(09DZXJ01)

摘　　要：在Grice的意义理论中,说话者意图是一个基本的、初始的概念。然而,面对语义—语用论的激烈批评,Grice不得不对言说的会话蕴含作出一个符合语义—语用论的解释以寻求认同。时至今日,Grice的意义理论被过度解读为语义—语用论,以致于其心理语言学方向的研究完全受到压制。通过对Grice的著作重新进行解读,我们力图恢复其心理语言学研究传统,并通过一个反例回击语义—语用论对心理语言学和说话者意图的批评。The concept of speaker＇s intention is the most fundamental and only primary notion in Grice＇s theory of meaning.Grice＇s interpretation of conversational implicature,however,in terms of semantic-pragmatic approach is just a matter of expediency,to escape from radical criticism of his opponents,and to get support from pragmatics.Today,Grice＇s theory of meaning is overinterpreted as a semantic-pragmatic theory,so that its characters from psycholinguistic research are excessively suppressed.By restating his thought on meaning,we try to recover his psycholinguistic research,as well as semantic-pragmatic research on meaning,and at last rebuke criticism on speaker＇s intention from semantic-pragmatic theory through a counter-example.

关 键 词：意义理论 说话者意图 会话蕴含 语义—语用论 心理语言学 

分 类 号：H0-05[语言文字—语言学]