检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓迪[1]
出 处:《广州广播电视大学学报》2016年第5期86-91,111,共6页Journal of Guangzhou Open University
摘 要:2016年4月18日,两高共同颁布了《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》(以下简称《解释》),解答了《刑法修正案(九)》实施近半年以来司法实务界、学界和社会大众关于贪污贿赂犯罪的疑问。在我国严打贪腐行为,对贪污腐败零容忍的形势政策下,《解释》的出台无疑使贪污贿赂犯罪,尤其是贪污罪和受贿罪的定罪和处罚更科学、更合理、更符合当前国情。然而,《解释》中存在的体系化漏洞也是不可忽视的,正确认识《解释》的进步性和局限性,有助于更好的解决贪污贿赂刑事案件的同时,为今后的立法和司法提供指导,更好的推进我国刑事法治的不断发展。On April 18, 2016, in responding to questions of corruption and bribery crimes widely concerned by judicial practitioners, scholars, and the public, the Supreme People's Court and Supreme People's Procuratorate jointly issued Interpretation of Laws Applicable to Crimes of Corruption and Bribery(hereafter referred to Interpretation). Undoubtedly, the Interpretation is a timely reply to defining and penalizing these crimes. However, there are still some defects in it. To better understand its advantages and disadvantages is to help crack the crime, give guidance to later practice, and further the construction of legislation and governance in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222