从失效专利反思实用新型专利审查制度——基于浙江省的实证  

Reflection of the Examination System of Utility Model from Ineffective Patents:Empirical Research in Zhejiang Province

作　　者：王雅芬[1] 徐杨柳[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学法学院知识产权学院,杭州310018

出　　处：《浙江工商大学学报》2016年第6期58-66,共9页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University

基　　金：浙江省自然科学基金"知识产权与区域经济发展"(LS13G03001)

摘　　要：对于近年来我国实用新型专利申请量持续增长而专利有效量未同步增长,失效专利仍大量存在的问题,文章基于浙江省失效专利信息的实证分析,得出失效实用新型专利大部分为非正常失效专利。经分析影响该结果的根本原因为授权实用新型专利质量不高,而影响其授权专利质量的主要因素为实用新型专利审查制度。经反思,相关法律法规对实用新型专利初步审查制度设置的不完善使得这类专利实际上不能被保证具备可专利性的要求。在此基础上,文章比较借鉴几个主要典型国家的实用新型审查制度并结合我国国情提出对应制度的完善设想。In recent years,China＇s utility model patent applications have been growing,yet the patent effective amount has not been keeping the same pace. There are still a lot of ineffective utility model patents. For this problem,this paper analyzes the ineffective patent information of Zhejiang Province and finds that most of the ineffective utility model patents are abnormal ineffective patents. Further detailed analysis shows that the root cause for the result is the low quality of the authorized utility model patent. The key factor that influences the authorized quality of utility model patent is the examination system of the utility model patent. The defects in relevant laws and regulations in the examination system of the utility model patent are the major obstacle to the actual realization of the requirements of the patent. On this basis,this paper compares the examination system of the utility model with those in other countries,draws lessons from them,and puts forward corresponding suggestions.

关 键 词：实用新型 非正常失效专利 授权专利质量 审查制度 

分 类 号：DF523[政治法律—民商法学]