死刑犯适用辅助生殖技术的法理辨析  

Application of Artificial Procreate in the Group of Condemned Criminal

作　　者：张为易[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院

出　　处：《中州学刊》2016年第10期63-65,共3页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"现代医疗技术中的生命伦理及法律问题研究"(11AZD111)

摘　　要：作为替代自然生殖过程中某一环节的人工辅助生殖技术,是伴随着人类对生育活动认识的变化而发展起来的。生育权的法律性质从身份权发展到人格权,以及辅助生殖技术的长足进步,促进了生育与婚姻的分离,这些变化为死刑犯适用辅助生殖技术提供了客观基础。从刑罚目的来看,死刑犯实现生育权不违背正义价值,关于死刑犯适用辅助生殖技术会产生负面社会效应的观点值得商榷。As the substitution of natural reproduction, artificial procreate has developed accompanied by the changes in the human understanding of natural reproduction. Reproductive rights has developed from status right attributes to personality attributes and artificial procreate has made considerable progress, which promote the separation of fertility and marriage, thus providing the objective basis for the application of artificial procreate in the group of condemned criminal. From the viewpoint of the penalty purpose, condemned criminal groups realizing reproductive rights have no violation of justice value. Further discussion should be made regarding the opinion that the application of artificial procreate in condemned criminal groups induces negative social effects.

关 键 词：辅助生殖技术 生育权 死刑犯 刑罚目的 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]