检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《吉林中医药》2016年第11期1166-1168,共3页Jilin Journal of Chinese Medicine
基 金:吉林省面向农村和城市社区卫生计生适宜技术推广项目(2015S006)
摘 要:目的通过比较常规针刺法和多针浅刺法在治疗眼肌痉挛疾病方面的效果,突出在治疗眼肌痉挛中多针浅刺方法的优势。方法将来诊患者随机分为对照组30人和治疗组30人。采用常规针刺法治疗对照组患者,治疗组采用多针浅刺法治疗。治疗2个疗程,每个疗程10 d。分别统计治疗后2组的疗效。结果治疗组有效率86.6%,对照组有效率66.6%。治疗组有效率高于对照组,2组患者的疗效差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论多针浅刺法可以引皮毛之邪外出,相对于常规针刺法效果显著,更有利于眼肌痉挛的恢复。Objective To compare the routine acupuncture method and effect of shallow needling in the treatment of spasm disease,prominent in the treatment of spasm in the shallow needling method advantage. Methods The use of Excel random function method in the future treatment of patients were randomly divided into the control group of 30 people and 30 people in the treatment group. In the control group patients were treated with conventional acupuncture therapy,and the other group were treated with multiple needle shallow needling method. A total of 2 courses of treatment,each course of 10 days. Curative effect of two groups after statistical treatment. Results The treatment group86. 6%,control group 66. 6%. The total effective rate of the treatment group was higher than that of the control group,the statistical results of P 〈0. 05,the curative effect of the two groups were significantly different. Conclusion In the treatment of numerous spasm,shallow needling can lead the fur evil out,has the advantages of simple operation,compared with the conventional acupuncture effect,more conducive to the recovery of muscle spasm.
分 类 号:R246.6[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.94.189