检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周汉华[1]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院法学研究所
出 处:《北方法学》2016年第6期5-15,共11页Northern Legal Science
摘 要:政府信息公开的范围是《政府信息公开条例》实施与修改中的难点领域。公安机关刑事执法信息是否应该公开,条例规定非常明确,但司法判例中普遍认定不属于条例适用范围,产生误读现象,过程耐人寻味。立法规定被误读,原因在于混淆知情权制度与行政诉讼受案范围制度,陷入路径依赖,导致的后果是条例赖以支撑的基础被解构,出现各种错位。深入剖析误读与被误读的整个过程,对于更好推进我国法律实施具有很强的借鉴意义。The publicity scope of government information is difficult to cope with in implementation and amendment of Regulations on Government Information Publicity. Whether the criminal enforcement information should be publicized has been specified clearly by this Regulation,however,in judicial judgments the application scope of this Regulation is generally denied and misread,which is rather thought- provoking. The misreading of legislative regulations results from the confusion of the system of right to know and the system of application scope of administrative litigation,which has led to path dependence. Consequently,the foundation which the Regulation is based on is deconstructed and various dislocations have occurred.Therefore,as an effective reference,a thorough analysis of the whole process of misreading and being misread is for better improving enforcement of law in our country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31