检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马静[1] 马蕊[1] 朱秀芝[1] 曲建平[1] 时昆[1] 孟巍[1] 王生萍[1] 冷菲菲[1] 程化坤[1]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省医院康复科,黑龙江哈尔滨150036
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2016年第21期215-217,共3页China Health Standard Management
基 金:黑龙江省卫生计生委科研课题(编号:2014-162)
摘 要:目的分析气管切开术后切口难愈合患者运用湿性愈合理论的护理效果。方法选择我院收治的需行气管切开术80例患者作为研究对象,随机将其分为观察组与对照组,每组各40例。对照组采用干性愈合护理干预,观察组给予湿性愈合护理干预。比较两组患者的感染率、换药次数、换药费用及拔管时间。结果与对照组相比,观察组患者换药次数较少,拔管时间较短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与传统干性愈合相比,湿性愈合干预效果更好,可显著减少换药次数,缩短拔管时间,不仅可降低感染率,还可有效减少护理人员的工作量。Objective To analyze after tracheotomy incision healing of patients using the nursing effect of wet healing theory. Methods Our hospital underwent tracheotomy in 80 patients as the research object,randomly divided into observation group and control group,40 cases in each group. The control group was treated with dry healing nursing intervention,the observation group was given the wet healing nursing intervention. The infection rate,the times of dressing change,the cost of dressing change and the time of extubation were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group,patients in the observation group had fewer times of dressing change and shorter extubation time,and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional dry healing, the intervention effect of wet healing is better,can significantly reduce the times of dressing change,shorten the extubation time,not only can reduce the infection rate,but also can effectively reduce the workload of nursing staff.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.48.13