检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建省厦门市厦门大学附属第一医院骨科,福建厦门361003
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2016年第21期247-249,共3页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的探讨JCI标准下的疼痛管理模式对全髋关节置换术围手术期的影响。方法分别选取2015年1~6月和2016年1~6月在本院行单侧全髋关节置换手术的患者为对照组和观察组,对照组患者按照常规进行护理,观察组患者采用JCI标准下的疼痛管理模式,比较两组术后当天、术后24小时和术后48小时疼痛评分(NRS)、首次下地行走时间、术后住院时间。结果观察组术后当天、术后24小时、术后48小时疼痛评分、首次下地行走时间、术后住院时间均优于对照组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论在全髋关节置换术围手术期对患者采用JCI标准下的疼痛管理模式,能够有效减轻患者术后疼痛,减少卧床时间,提高生存质量。Objective To investigate the effect of the pain management model under JCI standards applied to the patients undergone total hip arthroplasty(THA)in perioperative period. Methods Respectively select the patients in our ward undergone the unilateral THA from January to June in 2015 and from January to June in 2016 as the control group and the observation group. The control group patients was given routine pain management model,while the observation group patients was given the pain management model under JCI standards. Compared the two groups with pain score after surgery by using number rating scale(NRS),walking time for the first time and length of hospital stay after operation. Results The pain score,walking time for the first time and length of hospital stay after operation were all better in the observation group than in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion For the patients undergone the unilateral THA,the pain management model under JCI standards can effectively reduce the postoperative pain,shorten the time in bed and improve the live quality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117