检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中医临床研究》2016年第30期98-100,共3页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
基 金:广东省建设中医药强省课题;项目名称:改良总攻疗法治疗输尿管结石(项目编号:20141266)
摘 要:目的:评估改良总攻疗法治疗输尿管下段结石的临床疗效。方法:将109例输尿管下段结石患者随机分为试验组(57例)和对照组(52例),试验组接受改良总攻疗法治疗,对照组接受传统总攻疗法治疗。观察比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果:试验组治愈率及总有效率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:改良总攻疗法治疗输尿管下段结石疗效优于传统总攻疗法。Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the improved offensive therapy in treating distal ureteral calculus. Methods: 109 cases with distal ureteral calculus were randomly divided into the experimental group (57 cases) and the control group (52 cases), the experimental group received improved offensive therapy of ureteral calculus, and the control group received conventional offensive therapy of ureteral calculus, and the clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results: The cure rate and total efficiency of the experimental group were significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P 〈 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of improved offensive therapy was more effective than that of the conventional offensive therapy in treating distal ureteral calculus.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145