检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何军[1] HE Jun(Department of Cardiology, Affiliated 157th Hospital of Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510510, China)
机构地区:[1]广州军区广州总医院附属157医院心内科,广东广州510510
出 处:《心血管康复医学杂志》2016年第5期520-523,共4页Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
基 金:广州市科技局计划项目(2015132)~~
摘 要:目的:观察卡维地洛对高血压的疗效及对其糖脂代谢的影响。方法:选择我院2013年2月~2015年3月期间所收治的116例高血压患者作为研究对象。按照随机数字表法,患者被随机均分为阿替洛尔组(58例,接受阿替洛尔治疗)和卡维地洛组(58例,接受卡维地洛治疗)。观察比较两组患者治疗前、后收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、心率(HR)、空腹血糖(FBG)、总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、低密度脂蛋白-胆固醇(LDL-C)和血肌酐(SCr)水平,临床疗效以及不良反应。结果:与阿替洛尔组比较,卡维地洛组治疗总有效率(87.93%比98.28%)显著升高,P〈0.01。与治疗前比较,两组治疗后上述指标均显著降低(P均〈0.01);与阿替洛尔组比较,卡维地洛组治疗后SBP[(131.20±11.02)mmHg比(115.62±10.27)mmHg]、DBP[(82.01±6.75)mmHg比(75.68±5.21)mmHg]、HR[(65.14±6.32)次/min比(57.21±4.02)次/min]、FBG[(4.75±1.36)mmol/L比(3.65±1.24)mmol/L]、TC[(2.69±0.58)mmol/L比(2.10±0.41)mmol/L]、TG[(0.96±0.41)mmol/L比(0.72±0.35)mmol/L]、LDL-C[(1.95±0.57)mmol/L比(1.71±0.40)mmol/L]和SCr[(110.23±86.52)μmol/L比(99.97±61.02)μmol/L]水平降低更显著,P均〈0.01。两组均未发生明显不良反应,不良反应发生率(例次,8.62%比3.45%)无显著差异,P〉0.05。结论:与阿替洛尔比较,卡维地洛治疗高血压的临床疗效更佳,值得推广应用。Objective:To observe therapeutic effect of carvedilol on hypertension and its influence on glucose and lipid metabolism.Methods:A total of 116 hypertensive patients treated in our hospital from Feb 2013 to Mar 2015 were selected.According to random number table,patients were randomly and equally divided into atenolol group(n=58,received atenolol therapy)and carvedilol group(n=58,received carvedilol therapy).Levels of systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),heart rate(HR),fasting blood glucose(FBG),total cholesterol(TC),triglyceride(TG),low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C)and serum creatinine(SCr)before and after treatment,therapeutic effect and incidence of adverse reactions were observed and compared between two groups.Results:Compared with atenolol group,there was significant rise in total effective rate(87.93% vs.98.28%)in carvedilol group,P〈0.01.Compared with before treatment,there were significant reductions in all above indexes in two groups after treatment,P〈0.01all;compared with atenolol group after treatment,there were significant reductions in levels of SBP [(131.20±11.02)mmHg vs.(115.62±10.27)mmHg],DBP[(82.01±6.75)mmHg vs.(75.68±5.21)mmHg],HR [(65.14±6.32)beats/min vs.(57.21±4.02)beats/min],FBG [(4.75±1.36)mmol/L vs.(3.65±1.24)mmol/L],TC [(2.69±0.58)mmol/L vs.(2.10±0.41)mmol/L],TG [(0.96±0.41)mmol/L vs.(0.72±0.35)mmol/L],LDL-C [(1.95±0.57)mmol/L vs.(1.71±0.40)mmol/L]and SCr[(110.23±86.52)μmol/L vs.(99.97±61.02)μmol/L]in carvedilol group,P〈0.01 all.No apparent adverse reactions occurred in two groups,there was no significant difference in incidence rate of adverse reactions(cases,8.62% vs.3.45%)between two groups,P〈0.05.Conclusion:Compared with atenolol,carvedilol possesses better therapeutic effect in treating hypertension,which is worth extending.
分 类 号:R544.1[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13