“索南夏-叶斯柏森论争”多棱透视  

A Multiple Perspective on Sonnenschein-Jespersen Controversy

作　　者：张高远[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京财经大学外国语学院,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《外国语文》2016年第5期82-91,共10页Foreign Languages and Literature

基　　金：南京财经大学2015学年教改项目"苏格拉底问答法对培养英语专业学生批判性思维能力的效验"(JGY1529)部分成果

摘　　要："格"识别的标准问题堪称语言学史上一桩公案,在以英国学者索南夏与丹麦语言学家叶斯柏森各自为代表的两大阵营之间展开持久论战。索南夏在当今语言学界知者寥寥,但"灵魂"与时俱进,其提倡的有关格位术语至今依然通用。叶斯柏森著作拥有庞大读者群,其格位观点在为实践证明行之有效,但他将词品划分方式移用于格位分类这一做法并未赢得广泛接受,其创设的部分术语也未能为普通语言学所接受。本文回顾这场论战背景,评析双方论点,探析论战背后的深层动因,力图还原论战全过程,从而说明学术的钟摆总在摇晃中寻找平衡,任何绝对主义观点及其处理方式均难经受历史长河之涤荡。The present article is on the Jespersen-Sonnenschein Controversy,which is lastingly influential in the history of linguistics. Sonnenschein＇s ＂soul＂keeps advancing with the times,with the majority of his terminology accepted by the linguistic community,while Jespersen,with a large readership after his death,enjoys the continuously rising popularity,despite many of his terminology falling into oblivion nowadays. This study reveals the truth that the academic pendulum always strikes a balance,with none of the absolute views able to truly stand the test of time.

关 键 词：格(位) 形式 意义 索-叶论争 

分 类 号：H0-06[语言文字—语言学]