贵州省农民工城市化对农村的减贫效应  

Poverty Reduction Effect of Rural Workers' Urbanization in Rural Place of Guizhou

作　　者：张世兵[1] 丰凤[2] 

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学旅游与航空服务学院,中国贵州贵阳550025 [2]贵州财经大学经济学院,中国贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《经济地理》2016年第11期141-145,共5页Economic Geography

基　　金：贵州省社会科学规划课题(14GZYB15);湖南省教育科学规划重点资助项目(XJK016AZY005)

摘　　要：选取我国农村贫困问题相对突出的贵州省作为研究案例,在总结国内外研究成果的基础上,构建了基于收入效应与转移效应的农村减贫机制并建立理论模型,然后以贵州省作为总体考察了这两种效应对贵州全省的农村减贫作用,同时进一步对模型进行改进,运用面板数据分析了两种效应在贵州各市州的减贫作用的差异,从而总结出贵州农民工城市化的基本路径与策略。经研究发现,贵州各市州收入效应与转移效应的作用差异明显,经济相对发达的市州应以农民工就地城镇化为核心,经济欠发达的市州则应以农村经济为重点突破口。Solving the problem of rural poverty is a long and arduous task. The urbanization of migrant workers and the rural-urban shift provide opportunities and new challenges to this problem. This paper selects Guizhou Province as a case study because the problem of rural poverty in Guizhou is relatively prominent. This paper summarizes the research results at home and abroad, establishes the mechanism of rural poverty reduction based on income effect and transfer effect as a theoretical model, and then analyzes these two effects on rural poverty reduction in Guizhou Province, and further improves the model. The difference between the two effects on poverty reduction in different prefectures in Guizhou is also studied by using the panel data, and the basic path and strategy of rural workers＇ urbanization in Guizhou is thus summarized. The study finds that the income effect and transfer effect play different roles in the cities and prefectures, where there are relatively developed areas and undeveloped areas, and the former should focus on the local urbanization of migrant workers, and latter should treat economic development as a breakthrough.

关 键 词：农村 贫困 农民工城市化 收入效应 转移效应 减贫 贵州省 

分 类 号：F323.6[经济管理—产业经济]