检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘云志[1] 赵吉波[1] 房艳宇 张晨昕[1] 刘宏斌[1]
机构地区:[1]齐齐哈尔医学院附属第三医院神经三科,黑龙江齐齐哈尔161000
出 处:《中国卫生产业》2016年第32期75-77,共3页China Health Industry
摘 要:目的探讨CBL教学法结合标准化患者应用于临床医学生神经病学见习中的应用效果。方法将96名本科大四学生进行分组,分为试验组和对照组。试验组学生接受CBL与标准化患者教学联合应用,对照组使用传统临床带教的教学方式进行见习。见习结束后学生接受理论知识、临床实践及病例分析3项考试,按照所占比例不同最终算出学生的成绩。全部学生进行匿名调查问卷来进行教学方式的评价工作。比较应用两种不同的教学方式的学生在3项考试的成绩及总成绩,同时比较两种教学方式的满意度。结果试验组学生与对照组学生两者的理论考核成绩之间的差异无显著性(P>0.05)。试验组临床操作考核成绩、病例分析考核成绩及总成绩均高于对照组,两组临床操作考核成绩、病例分析考核成绩及总成绩之间的差异具有显著性(P<0.05)。CBL与标准化患者联合应用进行教学的试验组与传统带教见习对照组相比较,试验组学生在学习效率、自主学习能力、团队合作能力、学习兴趣、学习氛围及教师授课质量的满意率较对照组高,两组之间的差异有显著性(P<0.05),两组学生在对团队合作能力基教师沟通能力的满意率之间的差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论 CBL教学法联合标准化患者应用于神经病学的见习过程中有助于提高医学生的学习及临床实践能力,取得较好的效果。Objective To study the application effect of CBL teaching method combined with the standardized patients in the clinical practice of neurology. Methods 96 cases of senior students were divided into two groups, the test group adopted the CBL combined with the standardized patients teaching method, while the control group adopted the traditional clinical teaching method, and at the end of the practice, all students received three examinations of theoretical knowledge, clinical practice and case analysis, and the students' achievements were calculated according to different proportions, and teaching methods were evaluated by?anonymous questionnaires, and the achievement and total achievement of three examinations of students were compared, at the same time, the satisfactory degree of these two teaching methods were compared. Results There was no obvious difference in the theoretical examination score between the two groups (P〉0.05), and the clinical op- eration examination score, case analysis examination score and total score in the test group was higher than those in the control group, and the differences in the clinical operation examination score, case analysis examination score and total score were obvious(P〈0.05), and the learning efficiency, independent learning ability, team cooperation ability, learning in-terest, learning atmosphere and satisfactory rate to teaching quality in the test group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences between the two groups were not obvious (P〉0.05). Conclusion The application of CBL teaching method combined with the standardized patients in the clinical practice of neurology contributes to improving the learning ability and clinical practice ability of medical students, which can obtain a good effect.
分 类 号:R19[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38