检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯兵[1] 周晓倩[1] 卢晓旭[2] 陶然[1] 张爱平[1]
机构地区:[1]扬州大学旅游烹饪学院,江苏扬州225127 [2]华东师范大学教师教育学院,上海200062
出 处:《世界地理研究》2016年第6期166-176,共11页World Regional Studies
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41301138);国家社会科学基金项目(12CJY087);江苏省"青蓝工程"优秀青年骨干教师培养计划(2014-2016);国家旅游局旅游业青年专家培养计划(TYEPT201425);扬州大学高端人才培养计划(2014-2017)
摘 要:城市文化旅游发展兼顾文化和旅游的双重导向,提升城市文化旅游竞争力是实现旅游转型发展与文化发展繁荣的重要任务。本文阐述了城市文化旅游竞争力理论,构建城市文化旅游竞争力评价指标体系。基于熵值法,从动态演变的视角对长三角地区城市群2009年-2015年的文化旅游竞争力进行测评。结果表明:城市文化旅游竞争力总体上有所提高,位序较为稳定;苏州文化旅游品牌资源竞争力排名第一,其余指标上海均排名第一;上海、杭州、苏州和南京四地具有较强的综合竞争力。基于分析结果,提出了提高城市文化旅游竞争力的对策建议。The development of urban cultural tourism is under consideration to the dual task of culture and tourism, to enhance the competitiveness of urban cultural tourism is an important task to realize the transformation of tourism development and the prosperity of cultural development. According to the basic theory of urban cultural tourism competitiveness, the article constructs the evaluation index system of urban cultural tourism competitiveness. Based on the factor analysis method, the paper makes a survey of the cultural tourism competitiveness of 16 cities in the Yangtze River Delta region in 2009, 2011,2013 and 2015. The conclusions are: the urban cultural tourism competitiveness of Yangtze River Delta improved as a whole and the ranking is basically stable; Shanghai ranked first of all indexes except the brand resource competitiveness of cultural tourism of which Suzhou ranked first. The comprehensive competitiveness of Shanghai, Hangzhou, Suzhou and Nanjing belong to the first echelon. At last, According to the present situation of cultural tourism development in different cities, the article put forward the countermeasures and suggestions to improve the competitiveness of the urban cultural tourism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222