检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晓林[1] 张冲[2] 石德红[2] 梁君蓉[2]
机构地区:[1]陕西省宝鸡市金台医院消化科,陕西宝鸡721000 [2]陕西省宝鸡市解放军第三医院消化科,陕西宝鸡721000
出 处:《临床医学研究与实践》2016年第25期71-72,共2页Clinical Research and Practice
摘 要:目的观察腹腔镜取石术(LC)联合内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)治疗胆石症的临床疗效。方法对解放军第三医院100例胆石症患者采用LC+ERCP治疗,设为研究组,对同期100例胆石症患者采用常规开腹治疗,设为对照组,对两组的手术情况及取石成功率进行比较。结果研究组切口长度、术中出血量、住院时间明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);研究组取石成功率为93%,对照组取石成功率为88%,差异不显著(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜取石术联合内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗胆石症的取石成功率高,对患者身体伤害小,临床应用价值高。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic stone surgery combined with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of cholelithiasis. Methods One hundred cases of cholelithiasis patients with LC+ ERCP treatment were selected as study group, another 100 cases of patients treated with conventional open surgery were as control group. The operation situation and success rate of stone removal in the two groups were compared. Results The incision length, blood loss, hospital stay of the study group were significantly better than those of the control group (P〈 0.01); the stone removal success rate of the study group was 93%, which was higer than 88% of the control group (P〉0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic lithotomy joint endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of cholelithiasis has higher success rate, less bodily harm, and higher clinical value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222