中国“体育仲裁”制度建设之中间道路——以建立统一而相对独立的内部仲裁制度为视角  

On Compromising Method of Construction of China's Sport Arbitration System——Proceeding from Building United and Independent Sport Internal Arbitration System

作　　者：谭小勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院体育法学研究中心,上海201701

出　　处：《西安体育学院学报》2016年第6期657-665,共9页Journal of Xi'an Physical Education University

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(13YJA890026)

摘　　要：我国体育仲裁制度建设进展缓慢,其主要原因有:《体育法》与《立法法》及新修改的《立法法》冲突的法律障碍;体育"举国体制""金牌战略"等以计划经济为主要特征的体制机制;职业体育俱乐部及体育社团空壳化。为此,提出了在体育仲裁制度建设遭遇困境的情况下,根据我国体育行业发展现状和法律环境,先在中华全国体育总会之下建立统一而相对独立的体育行业内部仲裁制度和机构的思路,以先解决有法之治的问题,再解决良法之治的问题,并对"中间道路"的性质、中立性和独立性、法理基础、法律规制等问题进行了探讨。Process of construction of sports arbitration system in China is slow. There are several major reasons behind. There are conflicts among sports law, legislative law and newly-amended legislative law. There are systems such as ＇ the Whole-nation System＇ and ＇ gold medal strategy＇ in the sports which shows the major character of planned economy. There is emptyshell of sports clubs and sports association. Therefore, the essay suggests that when troubles come to the sports arbitration system in China, in consideration of the sports developing status and legal constitution, construction of internal arbitration system and institution in sports under the sports federation of trade unions is necessary to be undertaken firstly. To establish ＇ rule of law＇ shall precede the ＇ rule under good law＇. This is deemed as a key to the issue. The essay, thus, analyses the character of ＇the middle way＇ , neutrality, legal basis, legal regulation and so on.

关 键 词：体育仲裁 内部仲裁 中间道路 

分 类 号：D912.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]