检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于莹[1] 张功[1] 黄海量[1] 吕征[1] 仇大伟[1] 韩涛[1] 汤继芹[1]
出 处:《山东中医药大学学报》2016年第6期499-503,共5页Journal of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:山东省高等学校中医药抗病毒协同创新中心项目--中医药抗病毒应用基础与关键技术研究及产业化(编号:XTCX2014A-02)
摘 要:目的 :系统评价小青龙汤治疗肺炎的临床疗效与安全性。方法 :通过检索CNKI、VIP、Wan Fang Data等国内中文数据库自建库至2015年3月公开发表使用小青龙汤治疗肺炎的临床随机或半随机对照试验的文献,将符合纳入标准的研究通过系统Rev Man5.3统计学软件进行方法学质量评价,用Meta分析、漏斗图等分析方法统计数据。结果:符合纳入标准的6项研究,Meta分析结果显示总有效率合并相对危险度(RR)及95%可信区间(CI值)为1.25[1.16,1.34];症状及体征积分中包含咳嗽改善、气喘缓解、肺部影像对比改善、体温下降、肺部湿罗音消失等方面比较的MD(95%CI)值分别为-1.32[-1.85,-0.79],-1.27[-1.57,-0.98],-1.53[-1.92,-1.13],-1.25[-1.71,-0.80],-2.27[-2.63,-1.91]。结论 :小青龙汤治疗肺炎与单纯西医的常规用药相比,具有较好的临床疗效,且在症状改善等方面都显示出较大优势。但由于所纳入研究文献的方法学质量偏低,发生偏倚性较高,因此降低了文献系统评价的安全可靠性,故需要更为合理的高质量临床试验方法来验证。Objective :To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Xiaoqinglong decoction on pneumonia. Methods:The published clinical literature about Xiaoqinglong decoction in treating pneumonia with randomized or semi-randomized controlled trials were retrieved by CNKI,VIP and WANFANG Data from the time of building the databases to March,2015. The methodological quality of inclusive trails was assessed by RevManS.3 software,Meta-analysis,funnel plot analysis. Results:Total 6 studies were selected. Meta-analysis indicated that the overall effective rate,the risk rate(RR) with 95% confidence interval(C/) was 1.2511.16,1.34]. The symptom and sign scores included:MD value(95% CI)in the relief of cough and dyspnea,comparison with pulmonary images,temperature changes and disappearance of wheeze were -1.32 [-1.85 ,-0.79 ] ,-1.27 [-1.57 ,-0.98 ] ,-1.53 [-1.92,-1.13 ] ,-1.25 [-1.71 ,-0.80] ,-2.27 [-2.63 ,-1.91 ]. Conclusion:Xiaoqinglong decoction was compared to the routine western medicine for treating pneumonia with high curative effects on improving symptoms,but the low methodological quality and high partiality reduced the safety and reliability of the systematic review,so the more appropriate and high level methodology was needed.
分 类 号:R259.631[医药卫生—中西医结合]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.97.137