SF-36应用于中国期刊编辑人员健康评价的信度和效度研究  

Reliability and Validity of Using the SF-36 Scale in Journal Editors of China

作　　者：孙昌朋[1] 张金华[2] 李钰[1] 林萍[1] 陈望忠[1] 

机构地区：[1]南方医科大学学报编辑部,广东广州510515 [2]南方医科大学护理学院,广东广州510515

出　　处：《韶关学院学报》2016年第8期77-83,共7页Journal of Shaoguan University

基　　金：广东省科技计划项目(2016A030303010);南方医科大学青年科技人员培育项目(RW2015PY04);广东省高校学报研究会项目(2014201)

摘　　要：评价SF-36量表在测量中国期刊编辑人员健康中的信度和效度,为编辑人群选择适宜的健康测量工具并进行人群间的健康比较提供科学依据.采用整群抽样的方法抽随机取全国200家期刊编辑部1 200名编辑人员进行测试.结果表明:SF-36的Cronbach'sα系数为0.905,生理、心理两个子量表的总Cronbach'sα系数分别为0.846、0.888;8个维度的Cronbach'sα系数均大于0.77.两个分半量表的Spearman-Brown分半信度为0.768;效度分析中,各维度分与所属子量表分的相关系数均较大.因子分析提取出8个因子,累积贡献率为66.38%;旋转后各因子载荷与量表的设计结构基本吻合.因此,SF-36量表在测试中具有较好的信度和效度,适于评价编辑人群的健康状况.The paper is aimed to evaluate the SF-36 scale reliability and validity in measuring the health of journal editors in China,to select the appropriate tool for measuring the health of the population and editing comparison between healthy people and provide scientific basis. A cluster sampling method was randomly drawn nationwide 200 editorial departments 1 200 editorial staff for testing. Results showed the SF-36 Cronbach＇s α coefficient was0.905,physiological and psychological subscale total Cronbach＇s α coefficient was 0.018 46,0.888. Eeight dimensions Cronbach＇s α coefficient were more than 0.77. Two and a half scale Spearman-Brown split-half reliability was 0.768. In the validity analysis,each dimension of sub-sub-scale score correlation coefficients were larger. Eight factors were selected from factor analysis and the cumulative contribution rate was 66.38%; Each rotation of factors were significantly correlated to the design structure of the scale. The SF-36 scale has a good reliability and validity,and it is a reliable and valid measurement scale for the evaluation of health-related quality of life in journal editors of China.

关 键 词：编辑 健康评价 SF-36量表 信度 效度 

分 类 号：G238[文化科学]