检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑涛[1]
出 处:《西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第3期68-80,共13页Journal of Xidian University:Social Science Edition
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"完善基层社会治理机制研究"(项目编号:14JZD030);国家社会科学基金青年项目"农村土地流转的社会学研究"(项目编号:12CSH026)
摘 要:司法改革背景下法院立案制度改革在不断推进,但改革的基本思路需要反思。以土地补偿款分配纠纷诉讼为例,法院通过策略性解读相关法律表达其不予受理的总体倾向。在规范、非规范因素以及内外部组织结构因素的制约下,我国法院民事初审立案实践分享了"立案政治学"的解释框架。微观入手的实证研究表明,基于规范分析的法院立案制度改革思路缺乏对立案难现状的切实把握,相关理论陷入"内卷化"困境。我国立案制度改革应回应司法实践中的创造性立案策略,回归化解纠纷这一根本目的。The court's filing system is reformed constantly, but the fundamental theory of reformation should be reflected. In the litigation practice of revenue distribution of land expropriation compensation, the courts express their general tendency of denying by selecting the normative factors and situation factors, and internal/external factors. The court shared the explanatory framework of "filing politics" in the practice of filing. Through micro-empirical analysis we found that there are misunderstandings about the reform of filing system which based on specification law analysis. And the theory of filing system get into the volume change. Therefore, the reform of filing system should return to the resolution of disputes, which is the original purpose of judicial. And the filing reform should absorb the creativity filing strategies and dispute resolution modes from practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28