检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学教育学院,北京100871 [2]中国农业大学党政办公室,北京100083
出 处:《复旦教育论坛》2016年第6期61-66,共6页Fudan Education Forum
摘 要:以"2015年首都高校本科生学生发展状况调查"为基础,系统地比较了首都高校未通过认定的贫困生与通过认定的贫困生两个大学生群体的高校满意度差异和学生发展差异。研究显示,以家庭经济状况衡量,目前我国高校贫困生认定结果基本合理,但也存在部分学生未通过贫困生认定而家庭经济确实贫困的现象,而且这种申请未通过贫困认定的经历会对这部分贫困生群体造成一定的负面影响。进一步的研究发现,未通过认定的贫困生在对高校的满意度、发展能力、规范性参与和社会规范意识等方面均显著低于通过认定的贫困生。所以,高校相关组织应当积极发现和关注未通过认定的贫困生这一弱势群体,不断完善高校贫困生认定的管理工作和制度体系。Based on a survey on the development of undergraduate student in Beijing in 2015, this study systematically compares the differences in satisfaction of college and personal development between unidentified economically disadvantaged students and identified economically disadvantaged students. The study shows that the result of the identification of economically disadvantaged students in universities and colleges is basically reasonable at present. However, there are still some students with inferior economic background are not identified as economically disadvantaged students. The experience above will have a negative influence on unidentified economically disadvantaged students. The empirical study declares that unidentified economically disadvantaged students are not as good as identified ones in many aspects, such as satisfaction of college, development capacity, normative participation and awareness of social norms, it is imperative for universities and colleges to pay special attention to this group of students and improve the institutional system for the identification of economically disadvantaged students.
分 类 号:G649.2[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177