论物权推定规范  

Norms of Property Rights' Presumptions

作　　者：王雷[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国青年政治学院法学院

出　　处：《比较法研究》2016年第6期78-87,共10页Journal of Comparative Law

基　　金：2015年第一批国家社科基金后期资助项目"民法证据规范论:案件事实的形成与民法学方法论的完善"(项目编号:15FFX005);2014年国家社科基金重大项目"民法典编纂重大疑难问题研究"(项目编号:14ZDC017);2014年北京市社会科学基金项目"民法中证据规范的解释与适用:以北京市法院裁判为例"(项目编号:14FXC029)的研究成果

摘　　要：物权诉讼过程中的证明责任是案件裁判的重点问题,我国《物权法》中暗含大量的物权推定规范,这是《物权法》中证据规范的鲜明特色。从法律要件事实的角度,可以将我国《物权法》上的物权推定规范区分为三类:不动产登记簿的权利推定规范,占有的权利推定规范和不可反驳的物权推定规范。不动产和动产善意取得制度的构成要件及其证明责任并不相同,前者要求相对较低,这是由不动产登记簿公信力高于动产占有公信力所决定的,相比于占有,不动产登记簿具有更高的可信度和更坚实的信赖基础。The burden of proof is the key question of real right action. The Property Law in China contains a large number of presumptions of property rights,which is a distinctive characteristic of norms of evidence in the Property Law. From the perspective of classification of legal requirement,presumptions of property rights of the property law in our country can be divided into three categories： presumption of rights from the real property register,presumption of rights from possession and presumptions of property rights which can not be countered. The components and the burden of proof of obtainment in good faith of the real property or movable property is not the same,the former requirement is relatively low,which is determined by the credibility of the real property register is higher than that of possession. The realty register has higher credibility and more solid trust foundation.

关 键 词：证据规范 法律要件分类说 物权法 物权推定规范 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]