检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:夏冰[1,2] 司志国[1] 周垂帆[3] XIA Bing SI Zhiguo ZHOU Chuifan(Department of Environmental Art Engineering, Henan Vocational and Technical College, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046 College of Landscape Architecture,Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083 College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002)
机构地区:[1]河南职业技术学院环境艺术工程系,河南郑州450046 [2]北京林业大学园林学院,北京100083 [3]福建农林大学林学院,福建福州350002
出 处:《北方园艺》2016年第23期86-90,共5页Northern Horticulture
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(31400465);河南省科学技术厅软科学研究资助项目(162400410327)
摘 要:采用层次分析法对郑州市建成区49种(品种)常绿植物进行园林应用价值综合评价。以常绿植物园林应用价值为目标从观赏特性、抗性等不同方面筛选16个评价指标,建立模型。根据综合得分将其分为4个等级:Ⅰ级(〉4.4)园林应用价值高的种类5个;Ⅱ级(4.0~4.4)园林应用价值较高的种类23个;Ⅲ级(3.5~4.0)园林应用价值一般的种类10个;Ⅳ级(〈3.5)园林应用价值较低的品种11个。从研究结果看,该评价系统基本能够客观、准确地反映常绿植物园林应用价值,与实际应用情况基本相符,为常绿植物在郑州市建成区的推广应用提供了参考依据。Comprehensive evaluation on the application value of 49 kinds of evergreen plants in Zhengzhou city was developed by using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Sixteen evaluation indexes were selected from different aspects of ornamental characteristics,resistance and so on. They were divided into four grades according to the comprehensive score-Grade Ⅰ (more than 4. 4) species with high value on application in landscape were five; Ⅱ (4.0--4. 4) types of middle application value were 23; grade Ⅲ (3.5-4. 0) had 10 and grade (less than 3. 5) had 11. It could be induced that the evaluation system could objectively and accurately reflect the evergreen landscape value,in consistence with the actual application,and provided a theoretical basis for the popularization and application of the evergreen plants built in Zhengzhou from the results.
分 类 号:S727.5[农业科学—林木遗传育种]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3