检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁浩萍[1]
机构地区:[1]扬州市第一人民医院
出 处:《循证护理》2016年第4期219-221,共3页Chinese Evidence-Based Nursing
摘 要:[目的]探讨多重参与双向核对法在儿科静脉给药过程中的应用效果。[方法]将2015年1月—2015年12月我院2 502例住院患儿作为观察组,静脉给药过程中采用多重参与双向核对法进行核对。将2014年1月—2014年12月我院2 418例住院患儿作为对照组,静脉给药过程中采用传统的核对方法进行核对。比较两组患儿家长满意度和静脉给药错误发生情况。[结果]观察组患儿家长的满意度为99.00%,高于对照组的94.95%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组静脉给药错误发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]在儿科静脉给药过程中应用多重参与双向核对法,家长满意度明显提高,静脉给药错误发生率明显降低,有利于提高护理安全。Objective: To Probe into application effect of multiple participation and bidirectional checking method in course of pediatric intravenous administration. Methods:A total of 2 502 cases of hospitalized children from January 2015 to December 2015 were selected as observation group,and multiple participation and bidirectional checking method was used in course of intravenous administration. A total of 2 418 cases of hospitalized children from December 2014 to January 2014 were selected as control group,and traditional checking method was used in course of intravenous administration. Parents~ satisfaction and the incidence of intravenous medication errors between both groups were compared. Results: The parents' satisfaction in observation group was 99%, higher than that in control group(94.95 %), there was statistically significant difference(P〈0. 05). The incidence of intravenous medication errors in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group, there was statistically significant difference(P〈0.05). Conclusion: Multiple participation and bidirectional checking method in course of pediatric intravenous administration could improve parents' satisfaction and reduce incidence of intravenous medication errors,and it was helpful to imorove the nursing safety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.123.143