论妨碍通行行为人的侵权责任归责原则  

On Tort Liability Principle of Traffic Obstructionist

作　　者：杨会[1] 

机构地区：[1]成都理工大学文法学院,四川成都610059

出　　处：《政法论丛》2016年第6期141-148,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"侵权责任法实施中的疑难问题研究"(项目编号:12BFX083)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：《侵权责任法》第89条、《道路交通损害赔偿司法解释》第10条中的堆放、倾倒是主动行为,遗撒是被动行为。应当根据妨碍通行行为人不同的主观心态,配置不同的侵权责任归责原则:主动行为人的侵权责任归责原则为无过错责任原则,被动行为人是过错推定责任原则。"不合无过错责任原则的基础"的质疑不能成立。In Tort Liability Law of the PRC article 86 and Judicial Interpretation of Damage Compensation to Road Traffic article 10, piling and dumping article on a public road is active behavior, while scattering is passive be- havior. According to their different subjective attitude, obstructionist should get different tort liability principle. It means active obstructionist is no-fauh liability and passive obstructionist is presumption of fault liability. The ques- tion of ＂not conforming to the theory foundation of no-fauh liability principle＂ is not reasonable.

关 键 词：妨碍通行致害 归责原则 主动行为 被动行为 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]