检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国飞行试验研究院可靠性研究中心,西安710089
出 处:《航空工程进展》2016年第4期484-488,共5页Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering
摘 要:随着飞机各系统可靠性的不断提高,人为失误逐渐成为系统失效或造成飞行事故的主要因素,已成为设计及适航审定部门关注的重难点问题。当前国内外对于如何验证人为因素是否满足相关适航条款的要求仍处于理论探索阶段。针对上述问题,基于CCAR-25部条款分析试飞阶段民用飞机人为因素适航审定过程,包括基于SHELL模型及T.E.S.T矩阵的人为因素审定条款筛选,基于MOC5&MOC6的试验机符合性验证方法,并基于模糊评判方法给出数据分析实例。本文提出的人为因素适航审定思路及验证方法具有一定创新性,已在试飞阶段ARJ21-700飞机上初步应用,可为后续C919等民用飞机人为因素设计和适航审定提供技术支持和方法保证。With the development of system reliability for aircraft, human error is becoming one of the main factors leading to flight accidents, as well as the key difficulty and challenge for the design and airworthiness authorized departments. Currently, how to certify the compliance of the human factor is still in the theoretical exploration stage for both at home and abroad. Aiming at above problems, the airworthiness certification process based on CCAR-25 is analyzed, including the selection of 40 regulations relevant with human factor based on SHELL model and T. E. S. T matrix, also the means of compliance(MOC5 & MOC6) for flight test, and finally the data analysis example based on fuzzy evaluation is presented. The proposed thoughts and methods have been applied preliminarily in ARJ21-700 and can provide the technical support for design and airworthiness certification of human factor and ergonomics for other civil aircrafts such as C919.
关 键 词:试飞阶段 人为因素 适航审定 符合性验证 模糊评判
分 类 号:V217.1[航空宇航科学与技术—航空宇航推进理论与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.125