检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马路瑶[1] MA Luyao(Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310008, Zhejiang, China)
出 处:《宜宾学院学报》2016年第11期80-85,92,共7页Journal of Yibin University
摘 要:抢劫罪的成立以当场性为必要,而勒索财物型绑架罪在成立时并不排除满足当场性特征的可能性,因而不能将是否具备当场性作为区分两罪的标准。抢劫罪中财产法益被害人与人身法益被害人具有同一性,而勒索财物型绑架罪中因为以行为人利用第三人对人质担忧为必要,则其财产法益被害人与人身法益被害人应当相分离,因此两罪区分的关键在于实力控制行为与强取财物行为的对象是否具有同一性。Robbery is based on being on the spot, while the crime of kidnapping for extorting money or prop- erty could also be being on the spot, hence being on the spot is not the standard of distinguishing the two crimes. In robbery, victims of legal interests of property have identity with victims of personal legal inter- ests. In the crime of kidnapping for extorting money or property, victims of legal interests of property and victims of personal legal interests are separated because it is base on the third partyg worry to hostages:used by doers, hence the distinction to the two crimes lies in the identity of victims of legal interests of property and victims of personal legal interests.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43