非小细胞肺癌化疗中不同留置针方法的对比研究  

Comparative study of different methods of indwelling needle in chemotherapy of non small cell lung cancer

作　　者：张晓群[1] 赵荣诚[1] 张洪斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北省沧州市中心医院心内一科,河北沧州061001

出　　处：《实用临床医药杂志》2016年第22期24-26,共3页Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice

摘　　要：目的探讨不同留置针应用在非小细胞癌(NSCLC)化疗中的效果。方法选取非小细胞肺癌患者80例按照随机数字法分为对照组和研究组,各40例。2组患者均予以化疗辅助治疗且实施留置针,对照组以持续浅静脉留置针处理,研究组以1日静脉留置针处理,观察并比较2组患者临床效果、药物渗漏率及静脉炎发生率。结果研究组患者缓解率为77.50%,显著高于对照组的45.00%(P<0.05);研究组药物渗漏率与静脉炎发生率均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论非小细胞肺癌化疗中,1日静脉留置针的处理效果明显优于持续浅静脉留置针,可提高疗效并减少药物渗漏与静脉炎等,值得借鉴。Objective To investigate different methods of indwelling needle in chemotherapy of non small cell lung cancer（ NSCLC）. Methods A total of 80 patients with non small cell lung cancer were divided into two groups according to random number table method,with 40 cases in each group. Both groups were treated with chemotherapy as well as indwelling needle,control group was given continuous venous indwelling needle treatment,while the study group applied 1 day intravenous indwelling needle treatment. Clinical effect,the incidence of drug leakage and phlebitis were observed. Results The remission rate in the study group was 77. 50%,which was significantly higher than 45% in the control group（ P 〈 0. 05）. Drug leakage rate and phlebitis rate in the study group were significantly lower than that of the control group（ P 〈 0. 05）. Conclusion The efficacy of one day venous indwelling needle is significantly better than continuous superficial vein indwelling needle.It can improve efficacy,reduce drug leakage and phlebitis,so it is worthy of reference.

关 键 词：非小细胞肺癌 化疗 1日静脉留置针 持续浅静脉留置针 

分 类 号：R473.73[医药卫生—护理学]