女性公共领域与跨国空间正义的建构--弗雷泽女性主义公共领域理论探析  

Public Sphere for Females and Justice Construction in Transnational Space: on Fraser's Feminist Public Sphere Theory

作　　者：戴雪红[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学马克思主义学院人文社会科学高级研究院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2016年第6期78-84,共7页Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金“弗雷泽女性主义批判理论的逻辑谱系及其现实启示研究”(15BZX017)

摘　　要：弗雷泽从20世纪80年代起,就一直关注女性主义公共领域和公共空间问题的研究,经由对哈贝马斯公共领域理论和"威斯特伐利亚"框架的批判,弗雷泽重构了"女性公共领域"和"跨国公共领域"等概念,描绘了一幅多元交叉的女性公共空间与女性主义联盟的美好图景。在对跨国空间正义实践的研究中,弗雷泽还引用了"世界社会论坛"这一实例,试图应对全球化带来的对威斯特伐利亚的民主和社会正义理论的挑战。不过,弗雷泽的这一理论与实践的结合遭到了一些政治理论家的批评,他们认为在弗雷泽的跨国公共领域理论与世界社会论坛的实践之间存在着不协调,并对弗雷泽的全球民主和社会正义理论以及更普遍意义上的批判民主理论进行了批评和反思。Since 1980s, Fraser has been focusing on the study of public sphere and public space for females. Based on the criticism of Habermas’s public sphere theory and “Westphalia”framework, Fraser reconstructed the concepts such as “female public sphere”and “transnational space”and pictured a beautiful multi-dimensional prospect of the combination between female public sphere and feminism. In her research on justice practice in transnational space, referring to the instance of the World Social Forum, Fraser tried to meet the challenges of globalization to Westphalia’s concept of democracy and social justice. However, the combination of Fraser’s theory and practice has met with criticism from some political theorists. They believe Fraser ’s theory of transnational public sphere is not coordinated with the practice of the World Social Forum. They also criticize Fraser’s theory of global democracy and social justice and more general criticism of democracy.

关 键 词：弗雷泽 哈贝马斯 女性主义 公共领域 跨国空间正义 世界社会论坛 

分 类 号：B089.1[哲学宗教—哲学理论] D669.68[政治法律—政治学]