基于BIB-LCJ法与SD法的杜鹃专类园春季植物景观美学评价  

Evaluation of Plant Landscape Aesthetic of Special Garden of Rhododendron in Spring by BIB-LCJ Method and SD Method

作　　者：陈璐[1] 陈月华[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南林业科技大学风景园林学院,长沙410004

出　　处：《湖北农业科学》2016年第19期4907-4912,共6页Hubei Agricultural Sciences

摘　　要：杜鹃(Rhododendron L.)专类园是春季景观最具特色的专类园之一,运用BIB-LCJ法(Balanced Incomplete Block design-Law of Comparative Judgment,平衡不完全区组设计-比较评判法)对湖南省森林植物园国家杜鹃园25个景观样本进行了美学评价,根据200名评价者的评价结果,得出最优及最差景观样本;同时,40名相关领域人员采用SD法(Semantic Differential,语义学解析法)对以上样本也进行了评价。综合2种评价结果,认为最优景观样本为14、1、6、20号,最差样本为9、10、25、22号。对SD法评价结果进行SD分析和因子分析,得到影响杜鹃专类园春季植物景观的因子有环境、空间、形式、美感4个方面。Special garden of Rhododendron L. is one of the most special gardens with spring landscape characteristics. Aesthetic evaluation of 25 landscape samples in National Cuckoo Garden of Hunan Forest Botanical Garden was conducted by BIB-LCJ（Balanced Incomplete Block design-Law of Comparative Judgment） method. The best and worst landscape samples were obtained according to the evaluation of 200 reviewers. Meanwhile, the samples were evaluated by 40 related-field researchers using SD（Semantic Differential） method. Comprehensive results of the two methods showed that the optimal landscape samples were No.14, No.1, No.6, and No.20 samples; while the worst samples were No.9, No.10, No.25 and No.22.SD analysis and factor analysis of the evaluation results of SD method showed that the spring landscape in special garden of Rhododendron was mainly affected by the four factors including environment, space, form and aesthetics.

关 键 词：杜鹃(Rhododendron L.)专类园 美学评价 平衡不完全区组设计-比较评判法 语义学解析法 

分 类 号：S685.21[农业科学—观赏园艺]