贵州省旱坡地甘蔗品种比较试验  

Comparative Test of Sugarcane Varieties in The Upland Slope Field in Guizhou Province

作　　者：谢惠珏[1] 朱文华[1] 周正邦[1] 卢加举[1] 彭仕蓉[1] 

机构地区：[1]贵州省亚热带作物研究所,贵州兴义562400

出　　处：《湖北农业科学》2016年第19期5001-5003,共3页Hubei Agricultural Sciences

基　　金：贵州省农业科技攻关项目[黔科合NY字(2010)3015];贵州省2012年高技术产业发展专项;国家星火计划项目(2014GA820009)

摘　　要：2012-2013年,用黔蔗06/212、黔蔗06/156、黔蔗06/89、桂糖96/211、云蔗03/45、德蔗03/83和桂糖11号（CK）进行旱坡地新植和宿根品种比较试验。结果表明,6个参试品种均优于CK,与CK相比,各品种蔗茎产量、蔗糖分和单位面积含糖量分别增加了10.71%-50.86%、1.0-2.7个百分点和18.41%-64.02%。其中,桂糖96/211、德蔗03/83和黔蔗06/212表现较佳,蔗茎产量分别达102.51、112.38和109.10 t/hm2,分别比CK增产37.62%、50.86%、46.46%;蔗糖含量分别达17.37、17.24和17.19 t/hm2,分别比CK增加64.02%、62.80%、62.32%,达到了每667 m2吨糖的技术指标,可作为贵州省旱坡地优良甘蔗品种推广应用。Using Qinzhe06 / 212,Qinzhe06 / 156,Qinzhe06 / 89,Guitang96 / 211,Yunzhe03 / 45,Dezhe03 / 83 and Guitang11（CK） as materials,the variety comparison test of planting cane and ratoon cane in the upland slope field was conducted in 2012 to2013. The results indicated that,six test varieties were more superior than CK,sugarcane stalk yield was 10.71% to 50.86%higher than CK,sucrose ratio was 1.0 to 2.7 percentage points higher than CK,sucrose content was 18.41% to 64.02% higher than CK. Guitang96 / 211、Dezhe03 / 83 and Qianzhe06 / 212 showed better comprehensive characters than CK,sugarcane stalk yield was 102.51 t / hm2,112.38 t / hm2 and 109.10 t / hm2,and increased by 37.62%,50.86%,46.46% respectively compared with the control;sucrose content was 17.37 t / hm2,17.24 t / hm2 and 17.19 t / hm2,and increased by 64.02%,62.80%,62.32% respectively compared with the control. The yield of these three varieties achieved the technical indicators of 15 t / hm2,and could be popularized and utilized in the upland slope filed in Guizhou province.

关 键 词：甘蔗品种 品种比较试验 旱坡地 贵州省 

分 类 号：S566.1[农业科学—作物学]