检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《山西广播电视大学学报》2017年第1期72-76,共5页Journal of Shanxi Radio & TV University
摘 要:司法审判中引用宪法作为促进我国宪法得以有效实施的重要路径,在中国现有宪制框架下的引用宪法审判因无明确的法律依据作为支撑,所以饱受掣肘,但也应避免走上宪法司法化的道路。这些境况究其根源,在于人民法院引用宪法不仅受到来自人民代表大会制度等因素的影响,还受到如法律缺位等立法因素以及审判实践中法官与法院角色等司法因素的影响,为此善循其中有利于宪法实施的因素则显得尤为必要。The citation of the constitution in the judicial trial is an important way to promote the effective implementation of our constitution. However,the citation constitution under the existing constitutional framework of China should only be citation- oriented and should not be developed to the degree of the conceptualization of the constitution. Because in China,the court cite the constitution not only from the people's congress system and other institutional factors,but also by legal vacancies and other legislative factors as well as the court and judges' role and other judicial factors in the trial practice,so it is particularly necessary to search for the conducive factors to the implementation of the constitution.
关 键 词:引用宪法 司法审判 制度因素 立法因素 司法因素
分 类 号:D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28