检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈文昊
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871
出 处:《天津法学》2016年第4期18-25,共8页Tianjin Legal Science
摘 要:少年司法制度向我国的引入,以及对未成年人从轻从宽、甚至不入罪的刑事政策,能否起到预防青少年犯罪的作用,本身存在疑问。未成年人特殊处遇的刑事政策在古典学派与实证学派的立场上会有不同的解释进路,但在逻辑上均存在漏洞。我国《刑法》存在大量的"外围规制"条款,将引发、教唆、帮助青少年犯罪或严重违法的行为规定为犯罪,或者加重其刑罚适用,本质上是分配给成年人更多的风险和义务,抵消危害行为造成的社会不良影响,这也是未成年人得以减免处罚的依据。将未成年人的责任分配给处于"外围"的成年人不违背责任主义原则,也可以起到更好的社会预防效果。It has doubts itself whether the introduction of juvenile justice system and the policy of mitigation or immunity of punishment, even the discrimination of adolescent crimes have the effect of diminishing adolescent crimes or not. The special case of adolescent criminals has different explanation in the the classical criminology and the empirical criminology, but both have loopholes in logic. There are lots of peripheral regulations in our country's criminal law which punish or aggravate the punishment of the act of triggering, instigating or assisting adolescent crimes or offenses. It distributes more risk and duties to adults in essence to cancel of the negative effect of bad act, and it can be regarded as the basis of special case of adolescent criminals. The distribution of the responsibility of adolescent criminals to adults accords to the principle of responsibility, and it can have better social prevent effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222