检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]成都医学院第一附属医院,四川成都610500
出 处:《湖南中医药大学学报》2016年第A02期1213-1213,共1页Journal of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的 观察并分析脑卒中鼻饲患者实施床旁护理宣教的临床效果.方法 选取我院在2013年2月到2015年11月收治的72例脑卒中鼻饲患者作为研究对象,所有患者随机化分为观察组和对照组,每组各有患者36例.两组患者均配合常规的护理干预,在此基础上,对照组患者以常规的床旁护理宣教为主,观察组配合优质的床旁护理宣教,对两组患者的护理干预效果进行观察并做比较.结果 观察组患者家属对于鼻饲相关知识的掌握度明显高于对照组,观察组患者家属对护理工作的满意度高于对照组,两组比较,P〈0.05,差异明显,具有统计学意义.结论 临床上对于脑卒中鼻饲患者,在常规护理干预基础上,为患者配合优质的床边护理宣教,能够促进患者护理效果的提升,使患者家属更好地掌握鼻饲相关知识,提升护理的满意度,具有临床推广使用的价值.Objective Observation and analysis of brain in quenching the clinical effects of nasal feeding for patients ' bedside nursing education.Methods Take me home in February 2013, to November 2015, of the 72 cases of cerebral apoplexy patients with nasal feeding study, all the patients were randomly divided into two groups and the control group, with 36 cases in each group. Nursing intervention of the two groups were combined with normal, on this basis, patients in the control group dominated by conventional bedside nursing education, group quality bedside care mission, on the observation of the effect of nursing intervention in patients with both groups and compared.Result Observer Group of family members of patients with nasal feeding related knowledge, significantly higher than the control group, patients ' relatives to nursing job satisfaction in the observation group than in the control group, compared the two groups, P〈0.05, significant differences was statistically significant.Conclusion Clinical brain quenching on feeding patients, implement quality bedside care education to promote knowledge of the family members of patients with nasal feeding master, help patients recover, worthy of promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117