检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘君[1] 裴豪[1] 王俊[1] 戴亚萍[1] 翟桦梓 陈玉梅[1]
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2016年第24期5569-5571,共3页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基 金:江苏省自然科学基金面上研究项目(BK20151113)
摘 要:目的通过与两种常用的结核病快速诊断技术的比较,评价CBA检测方法在结核病诊断中的价值,为临床治疗提供参考依据。方法选取医院2015年3月-12月收治的住院患者191例,运用CBA技术、T-SPOT和结核分枝杆菌抗体检测对所有入组对象进行双盲检测,并对检测结果统计分析。结果 CBA检测的敏感性为86.82%,比T-SPOT 75.19%和结核分枝杆菌抗体检测38.76%均高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);CBA检测结果的特异性为91.94%,比T-SPOT 82.26%和结核分枝杆菌抗体检测的83.87%均高。结论 CBA技术的检测结果能有效的区分活动性结核病和其他肺部疾病,有利于控制结核病疫情的流行,为实现最终消灭结核病的长远目标提供了可靠的技术方法。OBJECTIVE To evaluate the value of CBA technology in the diagnosis of tuberculosis by comparison with two commonly used rapid detection techniques,so as to provide references for clinical treatment.METHODS A total of 191 patients were choosed in hospital from Mar.2015 to Dec.2015.All subjects were double-blind detected by using CBA technology,T-SPOT and TB antibody detection,then the test results were statistically analyzed.RESULTS The sensitivity of CBA was 86.82%,which was higher than 75.19% of T-SPOT and 38.76% of TB antibody detection,and the differences were significance(P〈0.05).The specificity of CBA was 91.94,which was higher than 82.26% of T-SPOT and 83.87% of TB antibody detection.CONCLUSION The results of CBA technology can effectively distinguish between active TB and other lung diseases,has great significance to control the development of TB epidemic,and provide a reliable technique to achieve the eventual goals of eliminating TB.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.204