基于城乡人口流动的福利资源配置研究  

Public Welfare Policy Research based on Urban and Rural Population Flow

作　　者：蔡瑞林[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]常州轻工职业技术学院,江苏常州213164 [2]南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院,江苏南京211106

出　　处：《技术经济与管理研究》2016年第12期93-98,共6页Journal of Technical Economics & Management

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(71573132)

摘　　要：文章构建了城乡人口流动二元模型,分析了不同福利资源配置策略对人口流动和城乡福利均衡的影响。研究发现:补缺型的"仅向农村投入"的配置策略是低效率的;"仅向城市投入"的福利配置策略是理论上的最优策略,但"同时向城乡投入且城市偏向"的配置策略仍然最符合中国国情和未来发展需要。尽管城市偏向的福利政策导致了城乡福利水平的差距,但并不能把纠正城市偏向等同于缩小城乡福利水平差距的治理逻辑,纠正城市偏向只是以牺牲效率为代价的局部性公平,对于整个城乡社会仍是不公平且低效率的。因此,政府的重心应致力创造公平的人口流动和国民福利待遇政策,继续实施"城市偏向"的福利资源配置策略,更高效率地实现城乡福利均衡。Through mathematical reasoning of welfare resources investment into population flow and the argument of welfare resources allocation strategy, the influence of three kinds of welfare resources allocation strategies. The research shows that investment only to the rural areas ＂is low-efficient＂ ; only to the city ＂is the best choice theoretically while＂ investment to the urban and rural areas with city preference＂ conforms to the national conditions and development. Therefore, although the urban preference welfare policy leads to the gap between the urban and rural welfare, we cannot equate correcting urban preference with narrowing the gap between urban and rural areas. Correcting urban preference is local fair at the cost of efficiency and it is unfair and inefficient for the whole urban and rural society. Therefore, the government should focus on creating fair population flow and welfare policy and continue ＇to implement the ＂urban preference＂ welfare resources allocation strategy, realizing urban and rural welfare equilibrium more efficiently through free flow of population.

关 键 词：社会福利 人口流动 城市偏向 城乡一体化 资源配置 

分 类 号：F126.2[经济管理—世界经济]