检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙振辉[1] 李楠[2] 辛景义[2] 刘军[2] 任志帅 孙和军[2]
机构地区:[1]天津市人民医院关节外科,300191 [2]天津市天津医院骨科
出 处:《中华医学杂志》2016年第47期3811-3814,共4页National Medical Journal of China
摘 要:目的 探讨全膝关节置换(TKA)测号器确定的股骨假体型号对前髁内侧悬出的影响。方法 分析2014年1月至2015年1月天津市人民医院关节外科收治的内翻型膝关节骨性关节炎患者61例(61膝),男14例,女47例;年龄(66.8±6.8)岁。采用Mimics软件建立股骨远端3D模型,模拟TKA手术并测量股骨内外髁前后径,依次采用测号器前后径法(测号器组)和外髁前后径法(外髁组)确定股骨假体型号(PFC Sigma),模拟假体安置和股骨四合一截骨,比较股骨前髁内侧覆盖不良情况。结果 股骨外髁前后径为(55.8±3.6)mm,显著小于测号器确定的股骨前后径[(57.0±3.6) mm,P〈0.05]。男性股骨远端不对称率(1.2%±0.1%)和女性(1.2%±0.2%)比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。测号器组股骨假体型号、股骨前斜、前髁中点内侧覆盖不良均显著大于外髁组(P〈0.05)。两种测号方法中男性股骨假体型号、假体前斜、前髁中点OH发生率均显著小于女性(P〈0.05)。结论 TKA采用测号器确定的股骨假体型号偏大并增加假体悬出风险。男性股骨假体前髁内侧悬出明显小于女性,但该差异与股骨远端不对称率无关。Objective To evaluate the medial anterior flange overhang related to the femoral prosthesis size determined by femoral sizer in total knee arthroplasty.Methods Sixty one cases of varus knee osteoarthritis (61 knees) were analyzed from January 2014 to January 2015, 14 males and 47 females, aged (66.8±6.8) year old. 3D models of distal femur were established by Mimics, total knee arthroplasty surgeries were simulated and the medial and lateral femoral condylar anteroposterior diameter were measured. According to the AP diameter of lateral femoral condyle (lateral condyle group) and femoral sizer (sizer group), different size of the PFC Sigma femoral prosthesis models were imported to mimics, and the coverage of medial anterior femoral flange were compared.Results The AP diameter of lateral femoral condyle[(55.76±3.64) mm]was significantly less than the sizer group[(57.02±3.59) mm], P〈0.05. The distal femur aspect ratio for male (1.2 %±0.1%) and female (1.2%±0.1%) has no statistically difference (P〉0.05). Femoral prosthesis sizes, the uncoverage diameter of the anterior chamfer line, midpoint of the flange in the sizer group were significantly larger than the lateral condyle group (P〈0.05). The femoral size, overhang ratio of anterior chamfer line and midpoint of the flange in male were significantly larger than females (P〈0.05).Conclusion The AP diameter determined by femoral sizer instrument had a tendency to larger prosthesis, and the risks of medial femoral anterior flange overhang increased. Medial anterior flange overhang in male was significantly less than female, but the difference had no correlation to the distal femur asepect ratio.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.228.247