夫妻生育权冲突司法裁判实证研究——以河南省X市人民法院司法裁判为文本  

The Empirical Research of Peoples' Court Judicial Referee on Couples' Reproductive Rights Conflict——Rely on Peoples' Court Judicial Referee Documents in X City in Henan Province

作　　者：阚在斌 

机构地区：[1]青海民族大学,青海西宁810007

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报》2016年第6期74-76,共3页Journal of Qiqihar Junior Teachers College

摘　　要：生育权作为自然人的一项基本权利,是人格权,具备绝对权、支配权属性。但生育权的实现有其天然限定条件:需男女双方配合,这就导致在现代婚姻家庭中夫妻双方在行使该权利时会经常面临冲突。目前,理论界关于生育权相关研究尚不完善、立法相对滞后,法官在处理此类案件时,多从伦理、道德、家庭观念层面去加以审视,实务中"同案不同判"的现象时有发生。本文试图以河南X市法院司法裁判文书为蓝本进行实证分析,进而释明对生育权进行体系化法律规制的必要性以及"代孕生育协议"限制性认可的可行性。Reproductive fights, as a fundamental right, is a natural person＇s personality right, which has some properties of absolute fights and control rights. But the realization of this fight has its natural qualification that needs both men and women to cooperate with the mea- sures, which leads to the both sides of husband and wife in the modem marriage and families have to face a conflict when the couples are in the exercises of the reproductive rights. At present, the theoretical circle on reproductive fights related to the factual research still is not perfect, the legislation in our country lags behind, and the judge deals with such cases in the perspective of ethics, morality, family val- ues, which results in a phenomenon of ＂different connection with the same sentence＂. This article attempts to focus on peoples＇ court judi- cial referee documents ,and to clarify the systematic legal regulation for reproductive rights and the necessity of the ＂surrogate birth agree- ments restricted the feasibility of the recognition.

关 键 词：生育权冲突 司法裁判 实证研究 代孕生育 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]