检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]<山西医科大学学报>编辑部,太原030001
出 处:《编辑学报》2016年第6期539-543,共5页Acta Editologica
基 金:山西医科大学科技创新基金资助项目
摘 要:为了分析多媒介融合出版技术对学术期刊同行评审制度的影响,为我国实施同行评审制度改革提供不同的选择途径,文章分析了传统学术期刊同行评审制度实施过程中遭遇的挑战和存在的问题,包括来自投稿数量的增加,来自非学术因素的干扰和传统评审制度自身的弊端。总结国内外重要期刊进行同行评审制度创新的模式,主要有开放同行评审、出版后同行评审和标准化同行评审等形式。认为:办刊人要充分利用多媒介融合出版技术下同行评审制度开放性、互动性、高效性的特点,创新中国学术期刊的同行评审制度,加强对同行评审制度的文化研究,强化同行评审的质量控制,以提高我国学术期刊的质量。In order to explore the impact of multi-media publishing technique on the peer review system of academic journal, the challenges and problems in practicing traditional peer review process for academic journals are investigated, which included the increase of academic paper volume, nonacademic factors' influence, and the shortcomings of traditional peer review system. Then the innovation modes of peer review system of some leading journals in western countries are discussed, which include open peer review system, post-publishing peer review system, and standard peer review system. At last, some suggestions are provided to improve the quality of Chinese academic journals. To integrate multimedia publishing technique into conventional paper based peer review system, we should take advantage of multi-media publishing' s openness, its interactivity and its effectiveness to innovate Chinese journals' peer review system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.3.240