不同替代能源密集烤房烟叶烘烤效能对比研究  

Effectiveness Comparative Study of Tobacco Curing on Different Alternative Energy Intensive Barn

作　　者：郭大仰 刘尚钱 肖志新[1] 刘芮[1] 彭坚强[1] 胡志明[1] 曹娜[1] 李丽[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南省烟草公司保山市公司,云南保山678000

出　　处：《安徽农业科学》2016年第33期99-102,共4页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences

基　　金：云南省烟草公司科技计划项目(2014YN32)

摘　　要：[目的]探索烟叶烘烤燃煤的替代能源。[方法]对生物质压块、生物质颗粒和醇基3类燃料与常规燃料（褐煤）的烟叶烘烤效能进行对比研究。[结果]3种替代能源在燃烧烟气中主要污染物的排放明显低于常规燃料,烘烤过程中升温速度、稳温性能明显提高（除生物质压块外）,整个烘烤工艺时间可缩短6-14 h,对初烤烟叶外观质量无明显影响;醇基燃料成本较高,烘烤综合成本约是褐煤成本的2.4倍,经济效益较差。[结论]生物质颗粒燃料可作为常规燃料（褐煤）的替代能源应用于烟叶实际烘烤工艺中。[Objective] The aim was to explore alternative energy of coal for baking.[Method] The baking efficiency of biomass briquetting, biomass particles, alcohol and conventional fuel （lignite） was comparatively studied.[Result] The results showed that alternative energy dur-ing combustion flue gas emissions of major pollutants were significantly lower than conventional fuel, heating speed, stable temperature per-formance was improved significantly （except fot biomass briquetting）, baking process could be shorten 6-14 hours, no significant effect on the appearance quality of cured tobacco leaves, alcohol baking overall costs were increased by approximately 2.4-fold compared with lignite. [Conclusion] Biomass particles can be used as alternative energy of conventional fuel（lignite）.

关 键 词：烟叶 生物质压块 生物质颗粒 醇基 褐煤 烘烤效能 

分 类 号：S509.2[农业科学—作物学] TS44[农业科学—烟草工业]